output: group verbose/debug messages by activity type #62
Labels
No labels
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
nagonag
nagonag/ignore
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
heiko/gogogo#62
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Currently
--verboseand--debugproduce a flat stream of messages.As the pipeline grows (HTTP requests, local git/go commands, file
operations, packaging steps) it becomes hard to filter noise.
Proposal
Introduce named output groups so users can enable only the categories
they care about:
http— HTTP requests and responses (currently only shown at debug level)cmd— external command invocations (git,go,dpkg-source,lintian,dupload, …)pack— packaging decisions (deb/rpm version derivation, revision detection, file writes)file— file copies, moves, and directory creation in the pipelinePossible CLI shapes
Or a single
--logflag that accepts category names.Motivation
During a
pack --debugrun the output mixes HTTP proxy verificationlogs with local
dpkg-sourceinvocations and file moves. A--debug=packflag would show only packaging decisions (revision derivation, orig
tarball creation, changelog.Debian.gz generation) without the noise
from unrelated subsystems.
Notes
(
pack:verbosevspack:debug), or categories could replace thetwo-level system entirely.
--verbose/--debugflags should keep working as"enable all categories at the given level" for backwards compatibility.
AI attribution comment added per repository instruction for this open issue.\n\n(co)authored by ai:gpt-5-codex